Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Copy-And-Paste Column

OUTTA LEFTFIELD: Milking a topic for what it’s worth: The Oreo turns 100
Published: Tuesday, March 06, 2012
By Mike Morsch
Executive Editor


I should have known.

In the interest of offering you critical information that you can utilize in your everyday life — as this space so often does, especially during the wacky political season — the Oreo celebrated its 100th birthday this week.

Long-time Borsch readers will know that this political season is only "wacky" because it's the Republican primary.

According to a wire service story,

This means he stole 90% of his content from said wire service story.

a woman by the name of Becky Tousey, corporate archivist for Kraft Foods who is apparently also known as the “Oreo historian,” revealed that the cookie has maintained the same advertising focus since its inception — that it is fun to eat.

The story (which I found) uses the phrase "maintained the same theme in its advertising over the years." This is the most effort Borsch will put into his copying from here on out. I really question whether "inception" is the proper word to use when referring to a cookie.

This, of course, raises the question: Kraft Foods actually employs someone as a “corporate archivist” and expert “Oreo historian”?

Cool. I believe I may have eaten enough Oreo cookies over the course of my lifetime to actually qualify as an “Oreo historian.” I plan to revise my resume to reflect such an accomplishment.


Did you like that "I eat a lot of Oreos" joke? I hope so. You'll be seeing it again. And again. And again.

Here are some other fun facts about the Oreo, according to the wire service story:

This is code for "the remaining 75% of the article is someone else's work."

— The cookie takes 59 minutes to make and consists of 12 flowers, 12 dots and 12 dashes on each side. Each cookie also has 90 ridges.

From the story: "The cookie, which takes 59 minutes to make, consists of 12 flowers, 12 dots and 12 dashes on each side. Each cookie has 90 ridges."

— The cookies are made of 29 percent crème and 71 percent cookie. They are produced in 21 bakeries around the world, and Kraft estimates that more than 500 billion Oreos have been sold since 1912.

You guessed it! From the story: "Oreos are made from 29 percent creme and 71 percent cookie. They are made in 21 bakeries around the world. Kraft Foods estimates that more than 500 billion Oreos have been sold since 1912." Changing punctuation = NOT copying. Kids, take note.

— I believe I am personally responsible for eating at least 1.5 billion of those Oreos, which puts me second on the All-Time Cookie Eater leader board behind, of course, the Cookie Monster. Oddly enough, I’ve never looked at them closely enough to realize that each cookie has a pattern that contains 12 flowers, 12 dots and 12 dashes. What that proves, I think, is that the cookies don’t stay in my hand long enough for me to get a good look at what’s on them.

HA! He eats large quantities of food. Funny. There's an entire, massive paragraph later based solely around this joke, but adds the fact that he drinks a lot of milk to the mix. Double HA!

— Market research reveals that 84 percent of men ate the cookies whole while 41 percent of women pulled the cookie apart.

Per the story: "...market research found that while 84 percent of men ate the cookie whole, 41 percent of women pulled the cookie apart.".

Count me among the 84 percent. I just ate a bunch last weekend and didn’t pull any of them apart. Of course, I’m pretty sure I am practicing the wrong technique there. Even though the women represent only a 41 percent minority of puller-aparters, it’s likely that we men have been doing it all wrong for the past 100 years.

What in hell is he saying here, exactly? Obviously he's doing his usual "men are stupid" thing, but does that mean that 59% of women are also stupid? Does he think that 41% of the entire population, who happen to all be women, pull the Oreo apart? If so, what happened to the 16% of men who do? Really, if Borsch ever reads this (and I know he does), I hope he explains what he was going for.

— Apparently nobody has been credited with coming up with the Oreo idea. However, Ms. Tousey, the “Oreo historian,” believes the name came from combining the “re” in “crème” and the two “o’s” in “chocolate.” I don’t mean to be critical, but that seems like a pretty thin theory for someone with the exulted title of “Oreo historian.” That cookie needs a better backstory.

Borsch says "apparently" because, per the story: "No one has been credited with coming up with the Oreo idea". Tousey's theory about the origin of the name is practically word-for-word, too.

— In 1921, the Oreo biscuit became the Oreo sandwich. In 1937, the name changed to the Oreo crème sandwich. I had no idea is was a biscuit or a sandwich and I’m still not sure why the original bakery — the National Biscuit Co. out of Manhattan — didn’t just name the cookie “The Best Dadgummed Cookie You’ll Ever Dunk in a Glass of Milk.” That certainly could have made for a better backstory if you ask me.

It's been a long time since he's used "dadgummed." And how exactly does a different name for the cookie create a "better backstory"?

— The popular cookie — its Facebook page currently has more than 25 million fans — has had five design changes and been marketed by three companies: the aforementioned National Biscuit Co., which became Nabisco, and now Kraft Foods. I remember is mostly as a Nabisco product.

"I remember is mostly"? Some executive editors didn't proofread!

According to company officials, a limited-edition Oreo with a confetti-sprinkled crème center that tastes like birthday cake has been unveiled for the 100th birthday of the cookie. Swell. Now I have to buy more cookies and milk.

Borsch does a good job of exactly repeating the wire service story again: "...a limited edition cookie with a confetti-sprinkled creme center that tastes like birthday cake."

Now, there might not be anything strictly wrong with repeating your source material word-for-word for the majority of your own column (although I doubt it). But it's further evidence that our favorite author is lazy, slipshod, and unoriginal - and unwilling to admit to it.

Given the history and popularity of the Oreo, it’s little wonder that it has lasted this long. The cookie has become part of the American fabric.

Which, of course, makes it a fitting topic for the next political debate. It’s about time our politicians started talking about something really important — like the best cookies of our time.


... What? Pathetic, sir. Truly a pathetic attempt to frame your copy-and-paste "column" within the context of the primaries (and how in the world he thinks the two topics should even be tenuously tied together is beyond me).

A reader posting under the name of "Kelly Simmons" left the following comment on Borsch's column: Yummy post! I fear for the future of the Republic.

4 comments:

  1. OMG! I was so glad to find your blog. I have vented about his column for a while now to friends - any one who will listen. What a waste of space. How about the asparagus one last week? Arrggh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I suppose he thinks that since he credits the "wire service story" then he's not doing anything wrong. I believe that if you reword something and credit the source that's fine, if you copy it WORD FOR WORD you must quote the original, not just credit it. I'm no expert, but then, clearly neither is Borsch.

    Two other points. First, how does eating a lot of something make you a 'historian'? A connoisseur perhaps, but somehow he equates having eaten lots of cookies to having a great knowledge of the history of the product.

    Second, I liked this paragraph...
    "Given the history and popularity of the Oreo, it’s little wonder that it has lasted this long. The cookie has become part of the American fabric." So basically, give the Oreo's history and popularity, it has a long history and is very popular. Well said Borsch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How much do you suppose Borsch gets paid? I mean, it seems like all he does is copy-and-paste his columns on a weekly basis, interview musicians he likes and talks about how intimate Sellersville Theater is, and go to baseball games in the spring. For a guy with "editor" in the title, he clearly doesn't do much editing based on how many mistakes you find on a regular basis in his stories. You think he fills 40 hours a week seeking out Associated Press stories to use for his column?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Would you believe I missed that asparagus post? Don't worry - I'm all over it now. And whatever Borsch gets paid, it's clearly too much. I would really love to know what lies he told in his interview to get that job...

    ReplyDelete

Followers